Paper detail

Sampling Online Social Networks: Metropolis Hastings Random Walk and Random Walk

As social network analysis (SNA) has drawn much attention in recent years, one bottleneck of SNA is these network data are too massive to handle. Furthermore, some network data are not accessible due to privacy problems. Therefore, we have to develop sampling methods to draw representative sample graphs from the population graph. In this paper, Metropolis-Hastings Random Walk (MHRW) and Random Walk with Jumps (RWwJ) sampling strategies are introduced, including the procedure of collecting nodes, the underlying mathematical theory, and corresponding estimators. We compared our methods and existing research outcomes and found that MHRW performs better when estimating degree distribution (61% less error than RWwJ) and graph order (0.69% less error than RWwJ), while RWwJ estimates follower and following ratio average and mutual relationship proportion in adjacent relationship with better results, with 13% less error and 6% less error than MHRW. We analyze the reasons for the outcomes and give possible future work directions.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Authors

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.