Paper detail

Running Time Analysis of Broadcast Consensus Protocols

Broadcast consensus protocols (BCPs) are a model of computation, in which anonymous, identical, finite-state agents compute by sending/receiving global broadcasts. BCPs are known to compute all number predicates in $\mathsf{NL}=\mathsf{NSPACE}(\log n)$ where $n$ is the number of agents. They can be considered an extension of the well-established model of population protocols. This paper investigates execution time characteristics of BCPs. We show that every predicate computable by population protocols is computable by a BCP with expected $\mathcal{O}(n \log n)$ interactions, which is asymptotically optimal. We further show that every log-space, randomized Turing machine can be simulated by a BCP with $\mathcal{O}(n \log n \cdot T)$ interactions in expectation, where $T$ is the expected runtime of the Turing machine. This allows us to characterise polynomial-time BCPs as computing exactly the number predicates in $\mathsf{ZPL}$, i.e. predicates decidable by log-space bounded randomised Turing machine with zero-error in expected polynomial time where the input is encoded as unary.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.