Paper detail

Run-and-tumble bacteria slowly approaching the diffusive regime

The run-and-tumble (RT) dynamics followed by bacterial swimmers gives rise first to a ballistic motion due to their persistence, and later, through consecutive tumbles, to a diffusive process. Here we investigate how long it takes for a dilute swimmer suspension to reach the diffusive regime as well as what is the amplitude of the deviations from the diffusive dynamics. A linear time dependence of the mean-squared displacement (MSD) is insufficient to characterize diffusion and thus we also focus on the excess kurtosis of the displacement distribution. Four swimming strategies are considered: (i) the conventional RT model with complete reorientation after tumbling, (ii) the case of partial reorientation, characterized by a distribution of tumbling angles, (iii) a run-and-reverse model with rotational diffusion, and (iv) a RT particle where the tumbling rate depends on the stochastic concentration of an internal protein. By analyzing the associated kinetic equations for the probability density function and simulating the models, we find that for models (ii), (iii), and (iv) the relaxation to diffusion can take much longer than the mean time between tumble events, evidencing the existence of large tails in the particle displacements. Moreover, the excess kurtosis can assume large positive values. In model (ii) it is possible for some distributions of tumbling angles that the MSD reaches a linear time dependence but, still, the dynamics remains non-Gaussian for long times. This is also the case in model (iii) for small rotational diffusivity. For all models, the long-time diffusion coefficients are also obtained. The theoretical approach, which relies on eigenvalue and angular Fourier expansions of the van Hove function, is in excellent agreement with the simulations.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.