Paper detail

Rotation and figure evolution in the creep tide theory. A new approach and application to Mercury

This paper deals with the rotation and figure evolution of a planet near the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance and the exploration of a new formulation of the creep tide theory (Folonier et al. 2018). This new formulation is composed by a system of differential equations for the figure and the rotation of the body simultaneously (which is the same system of equations used in Folonier et al. 2018), different from the original one (Ferraz-Mello, 2013, 2015a) in which rotation and figure were considered separately. The time evolution of the figure of the body is studied for both the 3/2 and 2/1 spin-orbit resonances. Moreover, we provide a method to determine the relaxation factor gamma of non-rigid homogeneous bodies whose endpoint of rotational evolution from tidal interactions is the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance, provided that (i) an initially faster rotation is assumed and (ii) no permanent components of the flattenings of the body existed at the time of the capture in the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance. The method is applied to Mercury, since it is currently trapped in a 3/2 spin-orbit resonance with its orbital motion and we obtain 4.8 times 10 -8 s -1 lower than gamma lower than 4.8 times 10 -9 s -1 . The equatorial prolateness and polar oblateness coefficients obtained for Mercury's figure with such range of values of gamma are the same as the ones given by the Darwin-Kaula model (Matsuyama and Nimmo 2009). However, comparing the values of the flattenings obtained for such range of gamma with those obtained from MESSENGER's measurements (Perry et al. 2015), we see that the current values for Mercury's equatorial prolateness and polar oblateness are 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the values given by the tidal theories.

preprint2019arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.