BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Hugo A. Folonier

Hugo A. Folonier contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.EP

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
1topics
2close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2022arXiv

Creep tide theory. Equations for differentiated bodies with aligned layers

The creep tide theory is used to establish the basic equations of the tidal evolution of differentiated bodies formed by aligned homogeneous layers in co-rotation. The mass concentration of the body is given by the fluid Love number $k_f$. The formulas are given by series expansions valid for high eccentricity systems. They are equivalent to Darwin's equations, but formally more compact. An application to the case of Enceladus, with $k_f=0.942$, is discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2019arXiv

Rotation and figure evolution in the creep tide theory. A new approach and application to Mercury

This paper deals with the rotation and figure evolution of a planet near the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance and the exploration of a new formulation of the creep tide theory (Folonier et al. 2018). This new formulation is composed by a system of differential equations for the figure and the rotation of the body simultaneously (which is the same system of equations used in Folonier et al. 2018), different from the original one (Ferraz-Mello, 2013, 2015a) in which rotation and figure were considered separately. The time evolution of the figure of the body is studied for both the 3/2 and 2/1 spin-orbit resonances. Moreover, we provide a method to determine the relaxation factor gamma of non-rigid homogeneous bodies whose endpoint of rotational evolution from tidal interactions is the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance, provided that (i) an initially faster rotation is assumed and (ii) no permanent components of the flattenings of the body existed at the time of the capture in the 3/2 spin-orbit resonance. The method is applied to Mercury, since it is currently trapped in a 3/2 spin-orbit resonance with its orbital motion and we obtain 4.8 times 10 -8 s -1 lower than gamma lower than 4.8 times 10 -9 s -1 . The equatorial prolateness and polar oblateness coefficients obtained for Mercury's figure with such range of values of gamma are the same as the ones given by the Darwin-Kaula model (Matsuyama and Nimmo 2009). However, comparing the values of the flattenings obtained for such range of gamma with those obtained from MESSENGER's measurements (Perry et al. 2015), we see that the current values for Mercury's equatorial prolateness and polar oblateness are 2-3 orders of magnitude larger than the values given by the tidal theories.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access