Abstract

The Roper state is extracted with valence overlap fermions on a 2+12+1-flavor domain-wall fermion lattice (spacing a=0.114a = 0.114 fm and mπ=330m_π = 330 MeV) using both the Sequential Empirical Bayes (SEB) method and the variational method. The results are consistent, provided that a large smearing-size interpolation operator is included in the variational calculation to have better overlap with the lowest radial excitation. Similar calculations carried out for an anisotropic clover lattice with similar parameters find the Roper ≈280\approx 280 MeV higher than that of the overlap fermion. The fact that the prediction of the Roper state by overlap fermions is consistently lower than those of clover fermions, chirally improved fermions, and twisted-mass fermions over a wide range of pion masses has been dubbed a "Roper puzzle." To understand the origin of this difference, we study the hairpin ZZ-diagram in the isovector scalar meson (a0a_0) correlator in the quenched approximation. Comparing the a0a_0 correlators for clover and overlap fermions, at a pion mass of 290 MeV, we find that the spectral weight of the ghost state with clover fermions is smaller than that of the overlap at a=0.12a = 0.12 fm and 0.090.09 fm, whereas the whole a0a_0 correlators of clover and overlap at a=0.06a = 0.06 fm coincide within errors. This suggests that chiral symmetry is restored for clover at a≤0.06a \le 0.06 fm and that the Roper should come down at and below this aa. We conclude that this work supports a resolution of the "Roper puzzle" due to ZZ-graph type chiral dynamics. This entails coupling to higher components in the Fock space (e.g. NπNπ, NππNππ states) to induce the effective flavor-spin interaction between quarks as prescribed in the chiral quark model, resulting in the parity-reversal pattern as observed in the experimental excited states of N,ΔN, Δ and ΛΛ.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.