Paper detail

Role of Ergodicity in the Transient Fluctuation Relation and a New Relation for a Dissipative Non-Chaotic Map

Deterministic dynamical systems such as the baker maps are useful to shed light on some of the conditions verified by deterministic models in non-equilibrium statistical physics. We investigate a 2D dynamical system, enjoying a weak form of reversibility, with peculiar basins of attraction and steady states. In particular, we test the conditions required for the validity of the Transient Fluctuation Relation. Our analysis illustrates by means of concrete examples why ergodicity of the equilibrium dynamics seems to be a necessary condition for the Transient Fluctuation Relation to hold. This investigation then leads to the numerical verification of a kind of transient relation which, differently from the usual Transient Fluctuation Relation (FR), holds only asymptotically. At the same time, it is not a steady state fluctuation relation, because no fluctuations are present in the steady state.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.