Paper detail

Role of electronic excitation on the anomalous magnetism of elemental Copper

Magnetic susceptibility of elemental copper (Cu) shows an anomalous rise at low temperatures superimposed on the expected atypical diamagnetic response. Such temperature dependent susceptibility, which is also known as the Curie tail, can not be explained on the basis of Larmor diamagnetic and Pauli paramagnetic contributions expected in Cu. Using valence band resonant photoemission spectroscopy results and density functional theory calculations, we show the magnetic anomaly appears due to presence of holes in Cu 3d band, which originates from thermally excited electronic configuration. Our study therefore highlights that the Curie tail, which is generally overlooked presuming it either due to paramagnetic impurities or defects, can in fact be intrinsic to a material, and even simple systems like elemental Cu is susceptible to electronic excitations giving rise to anomalous magnetic state.

preprint2021arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access7 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.