Paper detail

Rogue waves statistics in the framework of one-dimensional Generalized Nonlinear Schrodinger Equation

We measure evolution of spectra, spatial correlation functions and probability density functions (PDFs) of waves appearance for a set of one-dimensional NLS-like equations of focusing type, namely for the classical integrable Nonlinear Schrodinger equation (1), nonintegrable NLS equation accounting for dumping (linear dissipation, two- and three-photon absorption) and pumping terms (2) and generalized NLS equation accounting for six-wave interactions, dumping and pumping terms (3). All additional terms beyond the classical NLS equation are small. As initial conditions we choose seeded by noise modulationally unstable solutions of the considered systems in the form of (a) condensate for systems (1)-(3) and (b) cnoidal wave for the classical NLS equation (1). We observe 'strange' results for the classical NLS equation (1) with condensate initial condition including peak at zeroth harmonic in averaged over ensemble spectra, non-decaying spacial correlation functions and a 'breathing' region on the PDFs for medium waves amplitudes where frequency of waves appearance oscillates with time, while the far-tails of the PDFs remain Rayleigh ones. Addition of small dumping and pumping terms in model (2) breaks integrability that results in absence of the peak at zeroth harmonic in spectra, spacial correlation functions decaying to zero level and strictly Rayleigh PDFs for waves amplitudes. For the classical NLS equation (1) with cnoidal wave initial condition PDFs turn out to be significantly different from Rayleigh ones with 'fat tails' in the region of large amplitudes where higher waves appear more frequently, while for generalized NLS equation with six-wave interactions, dumping and pumping terms (3) we demonstrate absence of non-Rayleigh addition to the PDFs for zeroth six-wave interactions coefficient and increase of non-Rayleigh addition with six-wave interactions term.

preprint2013arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.