Paper detail

Robustness of spontaneous symmetry breaking in a bridge model

A simple two-species asymmetric exclusion model in one dimension with bulk and boundary exchanges of particles is investigated for the existence of spontaneous symmetry breaking. The model is a generalization of the bridge model for which earlier studies have confirmed the existence of symmetry-broken phases, and the motivation here is to check the robustness of the observed symmetry breaking with respect to additional dynamical moves, in particular, the boundary exchange of the two species of particles. Our analysis, based on general considerations, mean-field approximation and numerical simulations, shows that the symmetry breaking in the bridge model is sustained for a range of values of the boundary exchange rate. Moreover, the mechanism through which symmetry is broken is similar to that in the bridge model. Our analysis allows us to plot the complete phase diagram of the model, demarcating regions of symmetric and symmetry-broken phases.

preprint2009arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.