Paper detail

Robustness of power systems under a democratic fiber bundle-like model

We consider a power system with $N$ transmission lines whose initial loads (i.e., power flows) $L_1, \ldots, L_N$ are independent and identically distributed with $P_L(x)$. The capacity $C_i$ defines the maximum flow allowed on line $i$, and is assumed to be given by $C_i=(1+α)L_i$, with $α>0$. We study the robustness of this power system against random attacks (or, failures) that target a $p$-{\em fraction} of the lines, under a democratic fiber bundle-like model. Namely, when a line fails, the load it was carrying is redistributed equally among the remaining lines. Our contributions are as follows: i) we show analytically that the final breakdown of the system always takes place through a first-order transition at the critical attack size $p^{\star}=1-\frac{E[L]}{\max\{P(L>x)(αx + E[L ~|~ L>x])\}}~~~$; ii) we derive conditions on the distribution $P_L(x)$ for which the first order break down of the system occurs abruptly without any preceding diverging rate of failure; iii) we provide a detailed analysis of the robustness of the system under three specific load distributions: Uniform, Pareto, and Weibull, showing that with the minimum load $L_{\textrm{min}}$ and mean load $E[L]$ fixed, Pareto distribution is the worst (in terms of robustness) among the three, whereas Weibull distribution is the best with shape parameter selected relatively large; iv) we provide numerical results that confirm our mean-field analysis; and v) we show that $p^{\star}$ is maximized when the load distribution is a Dirac delta function centered at $E[L]$, i.e., when all lines carry the same load; we also show that optimal $p^{\star}$ equals $\fracα{α+1}$. This last finding is particularly surprising given that heterogeneity is known to lead to high robustness against random failures in many other systems.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.