Paper detail

Robustness Metric for Quantifying Causal Model Confidence and Parameter Uncertainty

Many methods of estimating causal models do not provide estimates of confidence in the resulting model. In this work, a metric is proposed for validating the output of a causal model fit; the robustness of the model structure with resampled data. The metric is developed for time series causal models, but is also applicable to non-time series data. The proposed metric may be utilized regardless of the method selected for fitting the causal model. We find that with synthetically generated data, this metric is able to successfully identify the true data generating model in most cases. Additionally, the metric provides both a qualitative measure of model confidence represented by the robustness level as well as accurate estimates of uncertainty in model coefficients which are important in interpreting model results. The use of this metric is demonstrated on both numerically simulated data and a case study from existing causal model literature.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.