Paper detail

Robust Two-Step Wavelet-Based Inference for Time Series Models

Complex time series models such as (the sum of) ARMA$(p,q)$ models with additional noise, random walks, rounding errors and/or drifts are increasingly used for data analysis in fields such as biology, ecology, engineering and economics where the length of the observed signals can be extremely large. Performing inference on and/or prediction from these models can be highly challenging for several reasons: (i) the data may contain outliers that can adversely affect the estimation procedure; (ii) the computational complexity can become prohibitive when models include more than just a few parameters and/or the time series are large; (iii) model building and/or selection adds another layer of (computational) complexity to the previous task; and (iv) solutions that address (i), (ii) and (iii) simultaneously do not exist in practice. For this reason, this paper aims at jointly addressing these challenges by proposing a general framework for robust two-step estimation based on a bounded influence M-estimator of the wavelet variance. In this perspective, we first develop the conditions for the joint asymptotic normality of the latter estimator thereby providing the necessary tools to perform (direct) inference for scale-based analysis of signals. Taking advantage of the model-independent weights of this first-step estimator that are computed only once, we then develop the asymptotic properties of two-step robust estimators using the framework of the Generalized Method of Wavelet Moments (GMWM), hence defining the Robust GMWM (RGMWM) that we then use for robust model estimation and inference in a computationally efficient manner even for large time series. Simulation studies illustrate the good finite sample performance of the RGMWM estimator and applied examples highlight the practical relevance of the proposed approach.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.