Paper detail

Robust statistical tools for identifying multiple stellar populations in globular clusters in the presence of measurement errors. A case study: NGC 2808

The finding of multiple stellar populations (MP), defined by patterns in the stellar element abundances, is nowadays considered a distinctive feature of globular clusters. However, while data availability and quality improved in last decades, this is not always true for the techniques adopted to their analysis, rising problems of objectivity of the claims and reproducibility. Using NGC 2808 as test case we show the use of well established statistical clustering methods. We focus the analysis to the RGB phase, where two data sets are available from recent literature for low- and high-resolution spectroscopy. We adopt both hierarchical clustering and partition methods. We explicitly address the usually neglected problem of measurement errors. The results of the clustering algorithms were subjected to silhouette width analysis to compare the performance of the split into different number of MP. For both data sets the results are at odd with those reported in the literature. Two MP are detected for both data sets, while the literature reports five and four MP from high- and low-resolution spectroscopy respectively. The silhouette analysis suggests that the population sub-structure is reliable for high-resolution spectroscopy data, while the actual existence of MP is questionable for the low-resolution spectroscopy data. The discrepancy with literature claims is explainable due to the difference of methods adopted to MP characterisation. By means of Monte Carlo simulations and multimodality statistical tests we show that the often adopted study of the histogram of the differences in some key elements is prone to multiple false positive findings. The adoption of statistically grounded methods, which adopt all the available information to subset the data and explicitly address the problem of data uncertainty, is of paramount importance to present more robust and reproducible researches.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.