Researcher profile

G. Valle

G. Valle contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 13 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
2works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

2 published item(s)

preprint2021arXiv

Robust statistical tools for identifying multiple stellar populations in globular clusters in the presence of measurement errors. A case study: NGC 2808

The finding of multiple stellar populations (MP), defined by patterns in the stellar element abundances, is nowadays considered a distinctive feature of globular clusters. However, while data availability and quality improved in last decades, this is not always true for the techniques adopted to their analysis, rising problems of objectivity of the claims and reproducibility. Using NGC 2808 as test case we show the use of well established statistical clustering methods. We focus the analysis to the RGB phase, where two data sets are available from recent literature for low- and high-resolution spectroscopy. We adopt both hierarchical clustering and partition methods. We explicitly address the usually neglected problem of measurement errors. The results of the clustering algorithms were subjected to silhouette width analysis to compare the performance of the split into different number of MP. For both data sets the results are at odd with those reported in the literature. Two MP are detected for both data sets, while the literature reports five and four MP from high- and low-resolution spectroscopy respectively. The silhouette analysis suggests that the population sub-structure is reliable for high-resolution spectroscopy data, while the actual existence of MP is questionable for the low-resolution spectroscopy data. The discrepancy with literature claims is explainable due to the difference of methods adopted to MP characterisation. By means of Monte Carlo simulations and multimodality statistical tests we show that the often adopted study of the histogram of the differences in some key elements is prone to multiple false positive findings. The adoption of statistically grounded methods, which adopt all the available information to subset the data and explicitly address the problem of data uncertainty, is of paramount importance to present more robust and reproducible researches.

preprint2020arXiv

Relevance of the small frequency separation for asteroseismic stellar age, mass, and radius. A statistical investigation for main-sequence low-mass stars

We performed a theoretical analysis on the relevance of the small frequency separation $δν$ in determining stellar ages, masses, and radii. We adopted the SCEPtER pipeline for low-mass stars, [0.7, 1.05] Msun. Synthetic stars were generated and reconstructed assuming different relative precision in $δν$ (5% and 2%). The quantification of the systematic errors arising from a mismatch between synthetic stars and the recovery grid was also performed. The biases were negligible. The statistical error in age estimates was strongly dependent on the stellar evolutionary phase. It is at its maximum at ZAMS and decreases to about 11% and 6% ($δν$ at 5% and 2% level) when stars reach the 30% of their evolutionary MS lifetime, then vanishes in the last 20% of the MS. For mass and radius estimates we detected nearly identical behavior for an observational uncertainty of 5%. No benefit was detected for mass and radius determinations from a reduction $δν$ precision to 2%. The impact on the age of the initial helium abundance resulted in negligible results. On the other hand greater bias (2% and 1%) in mass and radius estimates were detected whenever $δν$ is in the observational pool. This result, together with the presence of further unexplored uncertainty sources, suggest that precision in the derived stellar quantities below these thresholds may possibly be overoptimistic. [...] Finally, we compared the estimates by the SCEPtER pipeline for 13 Kepler asteroseismic LEGACY sample stars with those given by six different pipelines. Overall, on the LEGACY sample data, we obtained a multi-pipeline precision of about 4.4%, 1.7%, and 11% on the estimated masses, radii, and ages, respectively.