Paper detail

Robust Inference for Change Points in High Dimension

This paper proposes a new test for a change point in the mean of high-dimensional data based on the spatial sign and self-normalization. The test is easy to implement with no tuning parameters, robust to heavy-tailedness and theoretically justified with both fixed-$n$ and sequential asymptotics under both null and alternatives, where $n$ is the sample size. We demonstrate that the fixed-$n$ asymptotics provide a better approximation to the finite sample distribution and thus should be preferred in both testing and testing-based estimation. To estimate the number and locations when multiple change-points are present, we propose to combine the p-value under the fixed-$n$ asymptotics with the seeded binary segmentation (SBS) algorithm. Through numerical experiments, we show that the spatial sign based procedures are robust with respect to the heavy-tailedness and strong coordinate-wise dependence, whereas their non-robust counterparts proposed in Wang et al. (2022) appear to under-perform. A real data example is also provided to illustrate the robustness and broad applicability of the proposed test and its corresponding estimation algorithm.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.