Paper detail

Robust Hierarchical Patterns for identifying MDD patients: A Multisite Study

Many supervised machine learning frameworks have been proposed for disease classification using functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) data, producing important biomarkers. More recently, data pooling has flourished, making the result generalizable across a large population. But, this success depends on the population diversity and variability introduced due to the pooling of the data that is not a primary research interest. Here, we look at hierarchical Sparse Connectivity Patterns (hSCPs) as biomarkers for major depressive disorder (MDD). We propose a novel model based on hSCPs to predict MDD patients from functional connectivity matrices extracted from resting-state fMRI data. Our model consists of three coupled terms. The first term decomposes connectivity matrices into hierarchical low-rank sparse components corresponding to synchronous patterns across the human brain. These components are then combined via patient-specific weights capturing heterogeneity in the data. The second term is a classification loss that uses the patient-specific weights to classify MDD patients from healthy ones. Both of these terms are combined with the third term, a robustness loss function to improve the reproducibility of hSCPs. This reduces the variability introduced due to site and population diversity (age and sex) on the predictive accuracy and pattern stability in a large dataset pooled from five different sites. Our results show the impact of diversity on prediction performance. Our model can reduce diversity and improve the predictive and generalizing capability of the components. Finally, our results show that our proposed model can robustly identify clinically relevant patterns characteristic of MDD with high reproducibility.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.