Paper detail

Risk-averse Contextual Multi-armed Bandit Problem with Linear Payoffs

In this paper we consider the contextual multi-armed bandit problem for linear payoffs under a risk-averse criterion. At each round, contexts are revealed for each arm, and the decision maker chooses one arm to pull and receives the corresponding reward. In particular, we consider mean-variance as the risk criterion, and the best arm is the one with the largest mean-variance reward. We apply the Thompson Sampling algorithm for the disjoint model, and provide a comprehensive regret analysis for a variant of the proposed algorithm. For $T$ rounds, $K$ actions, and $d$-dimensional feature vectors, we prove a regret bound of $O((1+ρ+\frac{1}ρ) d\ln T \ln \frac{K}δ\sqrt{d K T^{1+2ε} \ln \frac{K}δ \frac{1}ε})$ that holds with probability $1-δ$ under the mean-variance criterion with risk tolerance $ρ$, for any $0<ε<\frac{1}{2}$, $0<δ<1$. The empirical performance of our proposed algorithms is demonstrated via a portfolio selection problem.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.