Paper detail

Risk-Adjusted Incidence Modeling on Hierarchical Survival Data with Recurrent Events

There is a constant need for many healthcare programs to timely address problems with infection prevention and control (IP&C). For example, pathogens can be transmitted among patients with cystic fibrosis (CF) in both the inpatient and outpatient settings within the healthcare system even with the existing recommended IP&C practices, and these pathogens are often associated with negative clinical outcomes. Because of limited and delayed data sharing, CF programs need a reliable method to track infection rates. There are three complex structures in CF registry data: recurrent infections, missing data, and multilevel correlation due to repeated measures within a patient and patient-to-patient transmissions. A step-by-step analysis pipeline was proposed to develop and validate a risk-adjusted model to help healthcare programs monitor the number of recurrent events while taking into account missing data and the hierarchies of repeated measures in right-censored data. We extended the mixed-effect Andersen-Gill model (the frailty model), adjusted for important risk factors, and provided confidence intervals for the predicted number of events where the variability of the prediction was estimated from three identified sources. The coverage of the estimated confidence intervals was used to evaluate model performance. Simulation results indicated that the coverage of our method was close to the desired confidence level. To demonstrate its clinical practicality, our pipeline was applied to monitor the infection incidence rate of two key CF pathogens using a U.S. registry. Results showed that years closer to the time of interest were better at predicting future incidence rates in the CF example.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.