Paper detail

Rigid polyboxes and Keller's conjecture

A cube tiling of R^d is a family of pairwise disjoint cubes $[0,1)^d+T=\{[0,1)^d+t:t\in T\}$ such that $\bigcup_{t\in T}([0,1)^d+t)=R^d$. Two cubes $[0,1)^d+t$, $[0,1)^d+s$ are called a twin pair if their closures have a complete facet in common, that is if $|t_j-s_j|=1$ for some $j\in [d]=\{1,..., d\}$ and $t_i=s_i$ for every $i\in [d]\setminus \{j\}$. In 1930, Keller conjectured that in every cube tiling of R^d there is a twin pair. Keller's conjecture is true for dimensions $d\leq 6$ and false for all dimensions $d\geq 8$. For $d=7$ the conjecture is still open. Let $x\in R^d$, $i\in [d]$, and let L(T,x,i) be the set of all $i$th coordinates $t_i$ of vectors $t\in T$ such that $([0,1)^d+t)\cap ([0,1]^d+x)\neq \emptyset$ and $t_i\leq x_i$. Let $r^-(T)=\min_{x\in R^d}\; \max_{1\leq i\leq d}|L(T,x,i)|$ and $r^+(T)=\max_{x\in R^d}\; \max_{1\leq i\leq d}|L(T,x,i)|$. It is known that Keller's conjecture is true in dimension seven for cube tilings $[0,1)^7+T$ for which $r^-(T)\leq 2$. In the present paper we show that it is also true for $d=7$ if $r^+(T)\geq 6$. Thus, if $[0,1)^d+T$ is a counterexample to Keller's conjecture in dimension seven, then $r^-(T),r^+(T)\in \{3,4,5\}$.

preprint2014arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.