Source author record

Andrzej P. Kisielewicz

Explore this author’s publications, collaborators and research topics. This catalog record has not been claimed by its author.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Catalog footprint

Research overview

7works
2topics
3close collaborators

Published work

7 publications

preprint2024arXiv

A note on a flip-connected class of generalized domino tilings of the box [0,2]n[0,2]^n

Let n,d∈Nn,d\in \mathbb{N} and n>dn>d. An (n−d)(n-d)-domino is a box I1×⋯×InI_1\times \cdots \times I_n such that Ij∈{[0,1],[1,2]}I_j\in \{[0,1],[1,2]\} for all j∈N⊂[n]j\in N\subset [n] with ∣N∣=d|N|=d and Ii=[0,2]I_i=[0,2] for every i∈[n]∖Ni\in [n]\setminus N. If AA and BB are two (n−d)(n-d)-dominoes such that A∪BA\cup B is an (n−(d−1))(n-(d-1))-domino, then A,BA,B is called a twin pair. If C,DC,D are two (n−d)(n-d)-dominoes which form a twin pair such that A∪B=C∪DA\cup B=C\cup D and {C,D}≠{A,B}\{C,D\}\neq \{A,B\}, then the pair C,DC,D is called a flip of A,BA,B. A family D\mathscr{D} of (n−d)(n-d)-dominoes is a tiling of the box [0,2]n[0,2]^n if interiors of every two members of D\mathscr{D} are disjoint and ⋃B∈DB=[0,2]n\bigcup_{B\in \mathscr{D}}B=[0,2]^n. An (n−d)(n-d)-domino tiling D′\mathscr{D}' is obtained from an (n−d)(n-d)-domino tiling D\mathscr{D} by a flip, if there is a twin pair A,B∈DA,B\in \mathscr{D} such that D′=(D∖{A,B})∪{C,D}\mathscr{D}'=(\mathscr{D}\setminus \{A,B\})\cup \{C,D\}, where C,DC,D is a flip of A,BA,B. A family of (n−d)(n-d)-domino tilings of the box [0,2]n[0,2]^n is flip-connected, if for every two members D,E\mathscr{D},\mathscr{E} of this family the tiling E\mathscr{E} can be obtained from D\mathscr{D} by a sequence of flips. In the paper some flip-connected class of (n−d)(n-d)-domino tilings of the box [0,2]n[0,2]^n is described.

preprint2022arXiv

Gluing and cutting cube tiling codes in dimension six

Let SS be a set of arbitrary objects, and let s↦s′s\mapsto s' be a permutation of SS such that s"=(s′)′=ss"=(s')'=s and s′≠ss'\neq s. Let Sd={v1...vd ⁣:vi∈S}S^d=\{v_1...v_d\colon v_i\in S\}. Two words v,w∈Sdv,w\in S^d are dichotomous if vi=wi′v_i=w'_i for some i∈[d]i\in [d], and they form a twin pair if vi′=wiv_i'=w_i and vj=wjv_j=w_j for every j∈[d]∖{i}j\in [d]\setminus \{i\}. A polybox code is a set V⊂SdV\subset S^d in which every two words are dichotomous. A polybox code VV is a cube tiling code if ∣V∣=2d|V|=2^d. A 22-periodic cube tiling of Rd\mathbb{R}^d and a cube tiling of flat torus Td\mathbb{T}^d can be encoded in a form of a cube tiling code. A twin pair v,wv,w in which vi=wi′v_i=w_i' is glue (at the iith position) if the pair v,wv,w is replaced by one word uu such that uj=vj=wju_j=v_j=w_j for every j∈[d]∖{i}j\in [d]\setminus \{i\} and ui=∗u_i=*, where ∗∉S*\not\in S is some extra fixed symbol. A word uu with ui=∗u_i=* is cut (at the iith position) if uu is replaced by a twin pair q,tq,t such that qi=ti′q_i=t_i' and uj=qj=tju_j=q_j=t_j for every j∈[d]∖{i}j\in [d]\setminus \{i\}. If V,W⊂SdV,W\subset S^d are two cube tiling codes and there is a sequence of twin pairs which can be interchangeably gluing and cutting in a way which allows us to pass from VV to WW, then we say that WW is obtained from VV by gluing and cutting. In the paper it is shown that for every two cube tiling codes in dimension six one can be obtained from the other by gluing and cutting.

preprint2014arXiv

On Keller's conjecture in dimension seven

A cube tiling of Rd\mathbb{R}^d is a family of pairwise disjoint cubes [0,1)d+T={[0,1)d+t:t∈T}[0,1)^d+T=\{[0,1)^d+t:t\in T\} such that ⋃t∈T([0,1)d+t)=Rd\bigcup_{t\in T}([0,1)^d+t)=\mathbb{R}^d. Two cubes [0,1)d+t[0,1)^d+t, [0,1)d+s[0,1)^d+s are called a twin pair if ∣tj−sj∣=1|t_j-s_j|=1 for some j∈[d]={1,…,d}j\in [d]=\{1,\ldots, d\} and ti=sit_i=s_i for every i∈[d]∖{j}i\in [d]\setminus \{j\}. In 19301930, Keller conjectured that in every cube tiling of Rd\mathbb{R}^d there is a twin pair. Keller's conjecture is true for dimensions d≤6d\leq 6 and false for all dimensions d≥8d\geq 8. For d=7d=7 the conjecture is still open. Let x∈Rdx\in \mathbb{R}^d, i∈[d]i\in [d], and let L(T,x,i)L(T,x,i) be the set of all iith coordinates tit_i of vectors t∈Tt\in T such that ([0,1)d+t)∩([0,1]d+x)≠∅([0,1)^d+t)\cap ([0,1]^d+x)\neq \emptyset and ti≤xit_i\leq x_i. It is known that if ∣L(T,x,i)∣≤2|L(T,x,i)|\leq 2 for some x∈R7x\in \mathbb{R}^7 and every i∈[7]i\in [7] or ∣L(T,x,i)∣≥6|L(T,x,i)|\geq 6 for some x∈R7x\in \mathbb{R}^7 and i∈[7]i\in [7], then Keller's conjecture is true for d=7d=7. In the present paper we show that it is also true for d=7d=7 if ∣L(T,x,i)∣=5|L(T,x,i)|=5 for some x∈R7x\in \mathbb{R}^7 and i∈[7]i\in [7]. Thus, if there is a counterexample to Keller's conjecture in dimension seven, then ∣L(T,x,i)∣∈{3,4}|L(T,x,i)|\in \{3,4\} for some x∈R7x\in \mathbb{R}^7 and i∈[7]i\in [7].

preprint2014arXiv

Rigid polyboxes and Keller's conjecture

A cube tiling of R^d is a family of pairwise disjoint cubes [0,1)d+T={[0,1)d+t:t∈T}[0,1)^d+T=\{[0,1)^d+t:t\in T\} such that ⋃t∈T([0,1)d+t)=Rd\bigcup_{t\in T}([0,1)^d+t)=R^d. Two cubes [0,1)d+t[0,1)^d+t, [0,1)d+s[0,1)^d+s are called a twin pair if their closures have a complete facet in common, that is if ∣tj−sj∣=1|t_j-s_j|=1 for some j∈[d]={1,...,d}j\in [d]=\{1,..., d\} and ti=sit_i=s_i for every i∈[d]∖{j}i\in [d]\setminus \{j\}. In 1930, Keller conjectured that in every cube tiling of R^d there is a twin pair. Keller's conjecture is true for dimensions d≤6d\leq 6 and false for all dimensions d≥8d\geq 8. For d=7d=7 the conjecture is still open. Let x∈Rdx\in R^d, i∈[d]i\in [d], and let L(T,x,i) be the set of all iith coordinates tit_i of vectors t∈Tt\in T such that ([0,1)d+t)∩([0,1]d+x)≠∅([0,1)^d+t)\cap ([0,1]^d+x)\neq \emptyset and ti≤xit_i\leq x_i. Let r−(T)=min⁡x∈Rd  max⁡1≤i≤d∣L(T,x,i)∣r^-(T)=\min_{x\in R^d}\; \max_{1\leq i\leq d}|L(T,x,i)| and r+(T)=max⁡x∈Rd  max⁡1≤i≤d∣L(T,x,i)∣r^+(T)=\max_{x\in R^d}\; \max_{1\leq i\leq d}|L(T,x,i)|. It is known that Keller's conjecture is true in dimension seven for cube tilings [0,1)7+T[0,1)^7+T for which r−(T)≤2r^-(T)\leq 2. In the present paper we show that it is also true for d=7d=7 if r+(T)≥6r^+(T)\geq 6. Thus, if [0,1)d+T[0,1)^d+T is a counterexample to Keller's conjecture in dimension seven, then r−(T),r+(T)∈{3,4,5}r^-(T),r^+(T)\in \{3,4,5\}.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.