Paper detail

Rightsizing the Railway Signal Workforce: a Zero-Based Resourcing Approach Towards Asset Management

Classic asset management approaches begin by inventorying all infrastructure assets and then assigning maintenance tasks and resources. Our approach collects similar data, but by starting with current personnel assignment and describing their job responsibilities and work processes, staff resistance in a railroad infrastructure owner-operator environment is minimized. Resulting "manning model" quantitatively measures signal maintenance burden including Federally mandated tests, trouble tickets, non-FRA maintenance, overhead and vacation coverage, location/shift assignment, administrative process, and work curfew productivity losses. It is capable of delivering immediate results by rightsizing allocation of workforce across shifts and maintenance base locations--even before all assets are formally inventoried. Typical data from a commuter passenger railroad shows that work curfews and shift assignment constraints have significant impacts on workforce productivity. Just over half of signal maintenance employee-hours are devoted to Federally mandated tests, whilst non-FRA and repair maintenance consumes about 25% each. These indicators provide intelligence driving strategic management actions to improve signal maintenance cost-effectiveness. This model provides workload-based employee assignment by craft, location, gang, and shift for maintenance manager use, but also provides analytical basis for establishing or abolishing positions in the budgeting process. Comparing its results with current employee payroll provides a measure of how much staffing stress the maintenance organization is under, which can help measure whether the current overtime usage is appropriate. Asset and maintenance task inventories collected in this process can also feed normal asset management processes to assess replacement cycles, asset failure risk, and to inform strategic and investment decisions.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.