Paper detail

Ridge-penalised spectral least-squares estimation for point processes

Penalised estimation methods for point processes usually rely on a large amount of independent repetitions for cross-validation purposes. However, in the case of a single realisation of the process, existing cross-validation methods may be impractical depending on the chosen model. To overcome this issue, this paper presents a Ridge-penalised spectral least-squares estimation method for second-order stationary point processes. This is achieved through two novel approaches: a p-thinning-based cross-validation method to tune the penalisation parameter, relying on the spectral representation of the process; and the introduction of a spectral least-squares contrast based around the asymptotic properties of the periodogram of the sample. The proposed method is then illustrated by a simulation study on linear Hawkes processes in the context of parametric estimation, highlighting its performances against more traditional approaches, specifically when working with short observation windows.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.