Paper detail

RFP: A Remote Fetching Paradigm for RDMA-Accelerated Systems

Remote Direct Memory Access (RDMA) is an efficient way to improve the performance of traditional client-server systems. Currently, there are two main design paradigms for RDMA-accelerated systems. The first allows the clients to directly operate the server's memory and totally bypasses the CPUs at server side. The second follows the traditional server-reply paradigm, which asks the server to write results back to the clients. However, the first method has to expose server's memory and needs tremendous re-design of upper-layer software, which is complex, unsafe, error-prone, and inefficient. The second cannot achieve high input/output operations per second (IOPS), because it employs out-bound RDMA-write at server side which is not efficient. We find that the performance of out-bound RDMA-write and in-bound RDMA-read is asymmetric and the latter is 5 times faster than the former. Based on this observation, we propose a novel design paradigm named Remote Fetching Paradigm (RFP). In RFP, the server is still responsible for processing requests from the clients. However, counter-intuitively, instead of sending results back to the clients through out-bound RDMA-write, the server only writes the results in local memory buffers, and the clients use in-bound RDMA-read to remotely fetch these results. Since in-bound RDMA-read achieves much higher IOPS than out-bound RDMA-write, our model is able to bring higher performance than the traditional models. In order to prove the effectiveness of RFP, we design and implement an RDMA-accelerated in-memory key-value store following the RFP model. To further improve the IOPS, we propose an optimization mechanism that combines status checking and result fetching. Experiment results show that RFP can improve the IOPS by 160%~310% against state-of-the-art models for in-memory key-value stores.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.