Paper detail

Revisiting the action of a subgroup of the modular group on imaginary quadratic number fields

Consider the modular group $\mbox{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})=\langle x, \, y \,|\, x^2=y^3=1\rangle$ generated by the transformations $x: z\mapsto -1/z$ and $y:z\mapsto (z-1)/z$. Let $H$ be the proper subgroup $\langle y,\,v\,|\, y^3=v^3=1\rangle$ of $\mbox{PSL}(2,\mathbb{Z})$, where $v=xyx$. The reference (M. Ashiq and Q. Mushtaq, {\em Actions of a subgroup of the modular group on an imaginary quadratic field}, Quasigropus and Related Systems {\bf 14} (2006), 133--146) proposed results concerning the action of $H$ on the subset $\{\frac{a+\sqrt{-n}}{c}\,|\, a,b=\frac{a^2+n}{c}, c \in \mathbb{Z}, c\neq 0\}$ of the imaginary quadratic number field $\mathbb{Q}(\sqrt{-n})$ for a positive square-free integer $n$. In the current article, the author points out and corrects errors appearing in the aforementioned reference. Most importantly, the corrected estimate for the number of orbits arising from this action is given.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.