Paper detail

Revisiting Shadow Detection from a Vision-Language Perspective

Shadow detection is commonly formulated as a vision-driven dense prediction problem, where models rely primarily on pixel-wise visual supervision to distinguish shadows from non-shadow regions. However, this formulation can become unreliable in visually ambiguous cases, where similar dark regions may correspond either to cast shadows or to intrinsically dark surfaces, making visual evidence alone insufficient for establishing a stable decision rule. In this work, we revisit shadow detection from a vision--language perspective and argue that robust prediction benefits from an explicit semantic reference beyond visual cues alone. We propose SVL, a Shadow Vision--Language framework that uses language as an explicit semantic reference to disambiguate shadows from visually similar dark regions. SVL aligns the global image representation with shadow-related text embeddings through a scene-level shadow ratio regression objective, thereby providing image-level guidance on the overall extent of shadows. To transfer this global guidance to dense inference, SVL introduces a global-to-local coupling mechanism that enforces consistency between image-level guidance and patch-level predictions. In parallel, SVL applies local patch-level constraints with text embeddings to improve fine-grained discrimination under challenging appearance conditions. Built on a frozen DINOv3 image encoder, the framework learns only lightweight projection and decoding modules, yielding a parameter-efficient design with less than $1\%$ trainable parameters. Extensive experiments on multiple shadow detection benchmarks, including dedicated hard-case evaluations, suggest strong overall performance and improved robustness under visually ambiguous conditions.

preprint2026arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.