Paper detail

Revisiting Round-Trip Translation for Quality Estimation

Quality estimation (QE) is the task of automatically evaluating the quality of translations without human-translated references. Calculating BLEU between the input sentence and round-trip translation (RTT) was once considered as a metric for QE, however, it was found to be a poor predictor of translation quality. Recently, various pre-trained language models have made breakthroughs in NLP tasks by providing semantically meaningful word and sentence embeddings. In this paper, we employ semantic embeddings to RTT-based QE. Our method achieves the highest correlations with human judgments, compared to previous WMT 2019 quality estimation metric task submissions. While backward translation models can be a drawback when using RTT, we observe that with semantic-level metrics, RTT-based QE is robust to the choice of the backward translation system. Additionally, the proposed method shows consistent performance for both SMT and NMT forward translation systems, implying the method does not penalize a certain type of model.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.