Paper detail

Revisiting Prioritized Experience Replay: A Value Perspective

Experience replay enables off-policy reinforcement learning (RL) agents to utilize past experiences to maximize the cumulative reward. Prioritized experience replay that weighs experiences by the magnitude of their temporal-difference error ($|\text{TD}|$) significantly improves the learning efficiency. But how $|\text{TD}|$ is related to the importance of experience is not well understood. We address this problem from an economic perspective, by linking $|\text{TD}|$ to value of experience, which is defined as the value added to the cumulative reward by accessing the experience. We theoretically show the value metrics of experience are upper-bounded by $|\text{TD}|$ for Q-learning. Furthermore, we successfully extend our theoretical framework to maximum-entropy RL by deriving the lower and upper bounds of these value metrics for soft Q-learning, which turn out to be the product of $|\text{TD}|$ and "on-policyness" of the experiences. Our framework links two important quantities in RL: $|\text{TD}|$ and value of experience. We empirically show that the bounds hold in practice, and experience replay using the upper bound as priority improves maximum-entropy RL in Atari games.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.