Paper detail

Revisiting Noether symmetry approach in F(R)-tachyon Model

Recently, some authors have made a falsifiable claim that Noether gauge symmetry for F(R) theory of gravity coupled to a tachyon field enforces gauge to vanish and leads to F(R) \propto R^2, with a tachyon potential V(ϕ) \propto ϕ^{-4}. Here, we show that the analysis is completely wrong since the conserved current does not satisfy the field equations. Earlier, it has been shown that F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum or in matter dominated era admits trivial Noether symmetry for F(R) \propto R^{3/2}, because z = a^2, a being the scale factor, becomes cyclic for F(R) \propto R^{3/2}. Further, it has already been noticed that F(R) does not admit Noether symmetry when coupled to a scalar sector, minimally or non-minimally. Finally, here we show that Noether symmetry is obscure even when F(R) is coupled to a tachyon field. However, Noether symmetry for R^2 gravity coupled to a scalar taking an auxiliary variable Q different from R exists in the literature and it is not recovered from F(R) gravity. Since, canonization of a general F(R) theory of gravity is only possible treating R as the auxiliary variable, so we conclude that in general Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity is obscure.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors1 topic

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.