BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Nayem Sk.

Nayem Sk. contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
astro-ph.COgr-qc

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 21 - Emerging
6works
0followers
2topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

6 published item(s)

preprint2014arXiv

Viability of Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity

Canonization of F(R) theory of gravity to explore Noether symmetry is performed treating R - 6(\frac{\ddot a}{a} + \frac{\dot a^2}{a^2} + \frac{k}{a^2}) = 0 as a constraint of the theory in Robertson-Walker space-time, which implies that R is taken as an auxiliary variable. Although it yields correct field equations, Noether symmetry does not allow linear term in the action, and as such does not produce a viable cosmological model. Here, we show that this technique of exploring Noether symmetry does not allow even a non-linear form of F(R), if the configuration space is enlarged by including a scalar field in addition, or taking anisotropic models into account. Surprisingly enough, it does not reproduce the symmetry that already exists in the literature (A. K. Sanyal, B. Modak, C. Rubano and E. Piedipalumbo, Gen.Relativ.Grav.37, 407 (2005), arXiv:astro-ph/0310610) for scalar tensor theory of gravity in the presence of R^2 term. Thus, R can not be treated as an auxiliary variable and hence Noether symmetry of arbitrary form of F(R) theory of gravity remains obscure. However, there exists in general, a conserved current for F(R) theory of gravity in the presence of a non-minimally coupled scalar-tensor theory (A. K. Sanyal, Phys.Lett.B624, 81 (2005), arXiv:hep-th/0504021 and Mod.Phys.Lett.A25, 2667 (2010), arXiv:0910.2385 [astro-ph.CO]). Here, we briefly expatiate the non-Noether conserved current and cite an example to reveal its importance in finding cosmological solution for such an action, taking F(R) \propto R^{3/2}.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Field independent cosmic evolution

It has been shown earlier that Noether symmetry does not admit a form of F(R) corresponding to an action in which F(R) is coupled to scalar-tensor action for gravity or even for pure F(R) gravity taking anisotropic model into account. Here, we prove that F(R) theory of gravity does not admit Noether symmetry even if it is coupled to Tachyonic field and considering a gauge in addition. To handle such a theory, a general conserved current has been constructed under a condition which decouples higher order curvature part from the field part. This condition in principle, solves for the scale factor, independently. Thus cosmological evolution remains independent of the form of the chosen field, whether it be a scalar or a tachyon.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Revisiting conserved currents in F(R) theory of gravity via Noether symmetry

Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum and in the presence of pressureless dust yields F(R) \propto R^{3/2} along with the conserved current \frac{d}{dt}(a\sqrt R) in Robertson-Walker metric and nothing else. Still some authors recently claimed to have obtained four conserved currents setting F(R) \propto R^{3/2} a-priori, taking time translation along with a gauge term. We show that the first one of these does not satisfy the field equations and the second one is the Hamiltonian which is constrained to vanish in gravity and thus a part and parcel of the field equations. We also show that the other two conserved currents, which do not contain time translation are the same in disguise and identical to the one mentioned above. Thus the claim is wrong.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Revisiting Noether symmetry approach in F(R)-tachyon Model

Recently, some authors have made a falsifiable claim that Noether gauge symmetry for F(R) theory of gravity coupled to a tachyon field enforces gauge to vanish and leads to F(R) \propto R^2, with a tachyon potential V(ϕ) \propto ϕ^{-4}. Here, we show that the analysis is completely wrong since the conserved current does not satisfy the field equations. Earlier, it has been shown that F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum or in matter dominated era admits trivial Noether symmetry for F(R) \propto R^{3/2}, because z = a^2, a being the scale factor, becomes cyclic for F(R) \propto R^{3/2}. Further, it has already been noticed that F(R) does not admit Noether symmetry when coupled to a scalar sector, minimally or non-minimally. Finally, here we show that Noether symmetry is obscure even when F(R) is coupled to a tachyon field. However, Noether symmetry for R^2 gravity coupled to a scalar taking an auxiliary variable Q different from R exists in the literature and it is not recovered from F(R) gravity. Since, canonization of a general F(R) theory of gravity is only possible treating R as the auxiliary variable, so we conclude that in general Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity is obscure.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2013arXiv

Why Noether symmetry of F(R) theory yields three-half power law?

Noether symmetry of F(R) theory of gravity in vacuum or in matter dominated era yields three-half power law of R. We show that this particular curvature invariant term is very special in the context of isotropic and homogeneous cosmological model as it makes the first fundamental form cyclic. As a result, it allows a unique power law solution, typical for this particular fourth order theory of gravity, both in the vacuum and in the matter dominated era. This power law solution has been found to be quite good to explain the early stage but not so special and useful to explain the late stage of cosmological evolution. The usefulness of Palatini variational technique in this regard has also been discussed.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2012arXiv

Revisiting Noether gauge symmetry for F(R) theory of gravity

Noether gauge symmetry for F(R) theory of gravity has been explored recently. The fallacy is that, even after setting gauge to vanish, the form of F(R) \propto R^n (where n \neq 1, is arbitrary) obtained in the process, has been claimed to be an outcome of gauge Noether symmetry. On the contrary, earlier works proved that any nonlinear form other than F(R) \propto R^3/2 is obscure. Here, we show that, setting gauge term zero, Noether equations are satisfied only for n = 2, which again does not satisfy the field equations. Thus, as noticed earlier, the only admissible form that Noether symmetry is F(R) \propto R^3/2 . Noether symmetry with non-zero gauge has also been studied explicitly here, to show that it does not produce anything new.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access