Paper detail

Revisiting excitation gaps in the fractional quantum Hall effect

Recent systematic measurements of the quantum well width dependence of the excitation gaps of fractional quantum Hall states in high mobility samples [Villegas Rosales {\it et al.}, Phys. Rev. Lett. {\bf 127}, 056801 (2021)] open the possibility of a better quantitative understanding of this important issue. We present what we believe to be accurate theoretical gaps including the effects of finite width and Landau level (LL) mixing. While theory captures the width dependence, there still remains a deviation between the calculated and the measured gaps, presumably caused by disorder. It is customary to model the experimental gaps of the $n/(2n\pm 1)$ states as $Δ_{n/(2n\pm 1)} = Ce^2/[(2n\pm 1)\varepsilon l]-Γ$, where $\varepsilon$ is the dielectric constant of the background semiconductor and $l$ is the magnetic length; the first term is interpreted as the cyclotron energy of composite fermions and $Γ$ as a disorder-induced broadening of composite-fermion LLs. Fitting the gaps for various fractional quantum Hall states, we find that $Γ$ can be nonzero even in the absence of disorder.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access5 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.