Paper detail

Revisiting Bayesian Autoencoders with MCMC

Autoencoders gained popularity in the deep learning revolution given their ability to compress data and provide dimensionality reduction. Although prominent deep learning methods have been used to enhance autoencoders, the need to provide robust uncertainty quantification remains a challenge. This has been addressed with variational autoencoders so far. Bayesian inference via Markov Chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) sampling has faced several limitations for large models; however, recent advances in parallel computing and advanced proposal schemes have opened routes less traveled. This paper presents Bayesian autoencoders powered by MCMC sampling implemented using parallel computing and Langevin-gradient proposal distribution. The results indicate that the proposed Bayesian autoencoder provides similar performance accuracy when compared to related methods in the literature. Furthermore, it provides uncertainty quantification in the reduced data representation. This motivates further applications of the Bayesian autoencoder framework for other deep learning models.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.