Paper detail

Revisiting Axial-Vector Meson Mixing

Various phenomenological studies indicate that the mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$ of $K_{1A}$ and $K_{1B}$, the strange partners of the axial-vector mesons $a_1(1260)$ and $b_1(1235)$, respectively, lies in the vicinity of $35^\circ$ or $55^\circ$, but whether this angle is larger or smaller than $45^\circ$ still remains controversial. When the $f_1(1285)$-$f_1(1420)$ mixing angle $θ_{^3P_1}$ and the $h_1(1170)$-$h_1(1380)$ mixing angle $θ_{^1P_1}$ are determined from the mass relations, they depend on the masses of $K_{1A}$ and $K_{1B}$, which in turn depend on the mixing angle $θ_{K_1}$. We show that the approximate decoupling of the light $q\bar q$ state from the heavier $s \bar s$ state, which is empirically valid for vector, tensor and $3^{--}$ mesons, when applied to isoscalar axial-vector mesons, will enable us to discriminate different solutions of $θ_{^3P_1}$ and $θ_{^1P_1}$ and pick up $θ_{K_1}\sim 35^\circ$. Indeed, for $θ_{K_1}\sim 55^\circ$, the predicted $θ_{^1P_1}$ disagrees sharply with the recent lattice calculation and the implied large $s\bar s$ content of $h_1(1170)$ and $q\bar q$ component of $h_1(1380)$ cannot explain the observation of their strong decays. We conclude that $θ_{K_1}$ is smaller than $45^\circ$.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.