Paper detail

Revisiting a Low-Dimensional Model with Short Range Interactions and Mean Field Critical Behavior

In all local low-dimensional models, scaling at critical points deviates from mean field behavior -- with one possible exception. This exceptional model with ``ordinary" behavior is an inherently non-equilibrium model studied some time ago by H.-M. Broker and myself. In simulations, its 2-dimensional version suggested that two critical exponents were mean-field, while a third one showed very small deviations. Moreover, the numerics agreed almost perfectly with an explicit mean field model. In the present paper we present simulations with much higher statistics, both for 2d and 3d. In both cases we find that the deviations of all critical exponents from their mean field values are non-leading corrections, and that the scaling is {\it precisely} of mean field type. As in the original paper, we propose that the mechanism for this is ``confusion", a strong randomization of the phases of feed-backs that can occur in non-equilibrium systems.

preprint2021arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.