Paper detail

Revised Tolmachev-Morel-Anderson pseudopotential for layered conventional superconductors with nonlocal Coulomb interaction

We study the effects of static nonlocal Coulomb interactions in layered conventional superconductors and show that they generically suppress superconductivity and reduce the critical temperature. Although the nonlocal Coulomb interaction leads to a significant structure in the superconducting gap function, we find that most properties can be effectively described by means of an appropriately revised local Coulomb pseudopotential $\tildeμ_C^*$, which is larger than the commonly adopted retarded Tolmachev-Morel-Anderson pseudopotential $μ^*_C$. To understand this, we analyze the Bethe-Salpeter equation describing the screening of Coulomb interaction in the superconducting state and obtain an expression for $\tildeμ_C^*$, which is valid in the presence of nonlocal Coulomb interactions. This analysis also reveals how the structure of the nonlocal Coulomb interaction weakens the screening effects from high-energy pair fluctuations and therefore yields larger values of the pseudopotential. Our findings are especially important for layered conventional superconductors with small Fermi energies and can be easily taken into account ab initio studies.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.