Paper detail

Review and Examination of Input Feature Preparation Methods and Machine Learning Models for Turbulence Modeling

Model extrapolation to unseen flow is one of the biggest challenges facing data-driven turbulence modeling, especially for models with high dimensional inputs that involve many flow features. In this study we review previous efforts on data-driven Reynolds-Averaged Naiver Stokes (RANS) turbulence modeling and model extrapolation, with main focus on the popular methods being used in the field of transfer learning. Several potential metrics to measure the dissimilarity between training flows and testing flows are examined. Different Machine Learning (ML) models are compared to understand how the capacity or complexity of the model affects its behavior in the face of dataset shift. Data preprocessing schemes which are robust to covariate shift, like normalization, transformation, and importance re-weighted likelihood, are studied to understand whether it is possible to find projections of the data that attenuate the differences in the training and test distributions while preserving predictability. Three metrics are proposed to assess the dissimilarity between training/testing dataset. To attenuate the dissimilarity, a distribution matching framework is used to align the statistics of the distributions. These modifications also allow the regression tasks to have better accuracy in forecasting under-represented extreme values of the target variable. These findings are useful for future ML based turbulence models to evaluate their model predictability and provide guidance to systematically generate diversified high-fidelity simulation database.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.