Paper detail

Reversible Reciprocal Relation of Thermoelectricity

The first Kelvin relation that states the Peltier coefficient should be equal to the product of temperature and Seebeck coefficient is a fundamental principle in thermoelectricity. It has been regarded as an important application and direct experimental verification of Onsager reciprocal relation (ORR) that is a cornerstone of irreversible thermodynamics. However, some critical questions still remain: why Kelvin's proof that omits all irreversibility within a thermoelectric transport process can reach the correct result, how to properly select the generalized-force-flux pairs for deriving the first Kelvin relation from ORR, and whether the first Kelvin relation is restricted by the requirement of linear transport regime. The present work is to answer these questions based on the fundamental thermodynamic principles. Since the thermoelectric effects are reversible, we can redefine the Seebeck and Peltier coefficients using the quantities in reversible processes with no time derivative involved, which are renamed as "reversible Seebeck and Peltier coefficients". The relation between them (called "the reversible reciprocal relation of thermoelectricity") is derived from the Maxwell relations, which can be reduced to the conventional Kelvin relation, when the local equilibrium assumption (LEA) is adopted. In this sense, the validity of the first Kelvin relation is guaranteed by the reversible thermodynamic principles and LEA, without the requirement of linear transport process. Additionally, the generalized force-flux pairs to obtain the first Kelvin relation from ORR can be proper both mathematically and thermodynamically, only when they correspond to the conjugate-variable pairs of which Maxwell relations can yield the reversible reciprocal relation. The present theoretical framework can be further extended to other coupled phenomena.

preprint2020arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access3 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.