Paper detail

Reverse process of usual optical analysis of boson-exchange superconductors: impurity effects on $s$- and $d$-wave superconductors

We performed a reverse process of a usual optical data analysis of boson-exchange superconductors. We calculated the optical self-energy from two (MMP and MMP+peak) input model electron-boson spectral density functions using Allen's formula for one normal and two ($s$- and $d$-wave) superconducting cases. We obtained the optical constants including the optical conductivity and the dynamic dielectric function from the optical self-energy using an extended Drude model, and finally calculated reflectance spectrum. Furthermore to investigate impurity effects on optical quantities we added various levels of impurities (from the clean to the dirty limit) in the optical self-energy and performed the same reverse process to obtain the optical conductivity, the dielectric function, and reflectance. We observed that impurities give similar effects on various optical constants of $s$- and $d$-wave superconductors; the more impurities give the more distinct gap feature and the less superfluid density. However, the $s$-wave superconductor gives the superconducting gap feature more clearly than the $d$-wave superconductor because in the $d$-wave superconductors the optical quantities are averaged over the anisotropic Fermi surface. Our results also supply helpful information to see how characteristic features of the electron-boson spectral function and the $s$- and $d$-wave superconducting gaps appear in various optical constants including raw reflectance spectrum. Our study also may help to understand the usual optical analysis process thoroughly. Further systematic study of experimental data collected at various conditions using the optical analysis process will help to reveal the origin of the mediated boson in the boson-exchange superconductors.

preprint2015arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.