Paper detail

Retrieving CeB$_6$'s lost magnetic entropy

The reported temperature variations of CeB6 s magnetic entropy are inconsistent with the fourfold degeneracy of the crystal field ground state. This old question is here addressed through new specific heat measurements and an improved description, in the cage context, of both the phonons and crystal field contributions to the specific heat. The antiferromagnetic transition is characterized as first-order and its latent heat determined. From the phonons dispersion for a cage compound, the lattice specific heat contribution is derived from the LaB6 data. Once corrected for the first-order transition and lattice contributions, the magnetic entropy displays the characteristic plateau of the quadruplet crystal field ground state, but at temperatures in excess of 30 K. Below 30 K, as the ordering temperature is approached, the magnetic entropy is substantially reduced. This anomalous temperature dependence is consistent with a crystal field ground state split by the rare-earth movement, a phenomenon specific to rare-earth cage compounds.

preprint2019arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.