Abstract

The {\em shortest common superstring} and the {\em shortest common supersequence} are two well studied problems having a wide range of applications. In this paper we consider both problems with resource constraints, denoted as the Restricted Common Superstring (shortly \textit{RCSstr}) problem and the Restricted Common Supersequence (shortly \textit{RCSseq}). In the \textit{RCSstr} (\textit{RCSseq}) problem we are given a set SS of nn strings, s1s_1, s2s_2, …\ldots, sns_n, and a multiset t={t1,t2,…,tm}t = \{t_1, t_2, \dots, t_m\}, and the goal is to find a permutation π:{1,…,m}→{1,…,m}π: \{1, \dots, m\} \to \{1, \dots, m\} to maximize the number of strings in SS that are substrings (subsequences) of π(t)=tπ(1)tπ(2)...tπ(m)π(t) = t_{π(1)}t_{π(2)}...t_{π(m)} (we call this ordering of the multiset, π(t)π(t), a permutation of tt). We first show that in its most general setting the \textit{RCSstr} problem is {\em NP-complete} and hard to approximate within a factor of n1−εn^{1-ε}, for any ε>0ε> 0, unless P = NP. Afterwards, we present two separate reductions to show that the \textit{RCSstr} problem remains NP-Hard even in the case where the elements of tt are drawn from a binary alphabet or for the case where all input strings are of length two. We then present some approximation results for several variants of the \textit{RCSstr} problem. In the second part of this paper, we turn to the \textit{RCSseq} problem, where we present some hardness results, tight lower bounds and approximation algorithms.

Explore this paper’s authors, topics and related work.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Reviews 0

Write a reviewWrite

No reviews yet.

Discussion 0

Add a commentWrite

No comments yet.