Source author record

Raphaël Clifford

Raphaël Clifford appears in the imported research catalog. Authorship, coauthor and topic links are available while profile ownership is still unclaimed.

ResearcherUnclaimed source record

Data Structures and Algorithms quant-ph

Catalog footprint

What is connected

4works

2topics

4close collaborators

Actions

Connect this record

Open graph Browse works

Inspect adjacent papers, topics, institutions and collaborators without losing the researcher page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

preprint2022arXiv

The Dynamic k-Mismatch Problem

The text-to-pattern Hamming distances problem asks to compute the Hamming distances between a given pattern of length $m$ and all length-$m$ substrings of a given text of length $n\ge m$. We focus on the $k$-mismatch version of the problem, where a distance needs to be returned only if it does not exceed a threshold $k$. We assume $n\le 2m$ (in general, one can partition the text into overlapping blocks). In this work, we show data structures for the dynamic version of this problem supporting two operations: An update performs a single-letter substitution in the pattern or the text, and a query, given an index $i$, returns the Hamming distance between the pattern and the text substring starting at position $i$, or reports that it exceeds $k$. First, we show a data structure with $\tilde{O}(1)$ update and $\tilde{O}(k)$ query time. Then we show that $\tilde{O}(k)$ update and $\tilde{O}(1)$ query time is also possible. These two provide an optimal trade-off for the dynamic $k$-mismatch problem with $k \le \sqrt{n}$: we prove that, conditioned on the strong 3SUM conjecture, one cannot simultaneously achieve $k^{1-Ω(1)}$ time for all operations. For $k\ge \sqrt{n}$, we give another lower bound, conditioned on the Online Matrix-Vector conjecture, that excludes algorithms taking $n^{1/2-Ω(1)}$ time per operation. This is tight for constant-sized alphabets: Clifford et al. (STACS 2018) achieved $\tilde{O}(\sqrt{n})$ time per operation in that case, but with $\tilde{O}(n^{3/4})$ time per operation for large alphabets. We improve and extend this result with an algorithm that, given $1\le x\le k$, achieves update time $\tilde{O}(\frac{n}{k} +\sqrt{\frac{nk}{x}})$ and query time $\tilde{O}(x)$. In particular, for $k\ge \sqrt{n}$, an appropriate choice of $x$ yields $\tilde{O}(\sqrt[3]{nk})$ time per operation, which is $\tilde{O}(n^{2/3})$ when no threshold $k$ is provided.

preprint2020arXiv

Faster classical Boson Sampling

Since its introduction Boson Sampling has been the subject of intense study in the world of quantum computing. The task is to sample independently from the set of all $n \times n$ submatrices built from possibly repeated rows of a larger $m \times n$ complex matrix according to a probability distribution related to the permanents of the submatrices. Experimental systems exploiting quantum photonic effects can in principle perform the task at great speed. In the framework of classical computing, Aaronson and Arkhipov (2011) showed that exact Boson Sampling problem cannot be solved in polynomial time unless the polynomial hierarchy collapses to the third level. Indeed for a number of years the fastest known exact classical algorithm ran in $O({m+n-1 \choose n} n 2^n )$ time per sample, emphasising the potential speed advantage of quantum computation. The advantage was reduced by Clifford and Clifford (2018) who gave a significantly faster classical solution taking $O(n 2^n + \operatorname{poly}(m,n))$ time and linear space, matching the complexity of computing the permanent of a single matrix when $m$ is polynomial in $n$. We continue by presenting an algorithm for Boson Sampling whose average-case time complexity is much faster when $m$ is proportional to $n$. In particular, when $m = n$ our algorithm runs in approximately $O(n\cdot1.69^n)$ time on average. This result further increases the problem size needed to establish quantum computational supremacy via Boson Sampling.

preprint2015arXiv

The k-mismatch problem revisited

We revisit the complexity of one of the most basic problems in pattern matching. In the k-mismatch problem we must compute the Hamming distance between a pattern of length m and every m-length substring of a text of length n, as long as that Hamming distance is at most k. Where the Hamming distance is greater than k at some alignment of the pattern and text, we simply output "No". We study this problem in both the standard offline setting and also as a streaming problem. In the streaming k-mismatch problem the text arrives one symbol at a time and we must give an output before processing any future symbols. Our main results are as follows: 1) Our first result is a deterministic $O(n k^2\log{k} / m+n \text{polylog} m)$ time offline algorithm for k-mismatch on a text of length n. This is a factor of k improvement over the fastest previous result of this form from SODA 2000 by Amihood Amir et al. 2) We then give a randomised and online algorithm which runs in the same time complexity but requires only $O(k^2\text{polylog} {m})$ space in total. 3) Next we give a randomised $(1+ε)$-approximation algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which uses $O(k^2\text{polylog} m / ε^2)$ space and runs in $O(\text{polylog} m / ε^2)$ worst-case time per arriving symbol. 4) Finally we combine our new results to derive a randomised $O(k^2\text{polylog} {m})$ space algorithm for the streaming k-mismatch problem which runs in $O(\sqrt{k}\log{k} + \text{polylog} {m})$ worst-case time per arriving symbol. This improves the best previous space complexity for streaming k-mismatch from FOCS 2009 by Benny Porat and Ely Porat by a factor of k. We also improve the time complexity of this previous result by an even greater factor to match the fastest known offline algorithm (up to logarithmic factors).

preprint2010arXiv

Restricted Common Superstring and Restricted Common Supersequence

The {\em shortest common superstring} and the {\em shortest common supersequence} are two well studied problems having a wide range of applications. In this paper we consider both problems with resource constraints, denoted as the Restricted Common Superstring (shortly \textit{RCSstr}) problem and the Restricted Common Supersequence (shortly \textit{RCSseq}). In the \textit{RCSstr} (\textit{RCSseq}) problem we are given a set $S$ of $n$ strings, $s_1$, $s_2$, $\ldots$, $s_n$, and a multiset $t = \{t_1, t_2, \dots, t_m\}$, and the goal is to find a permutation $π: \{1, \dots, m\} \to \{1, \dots, m\}$ to maximize the number of strings in $S$ that are substrings (subsequences) of $π(t) = t_{π(1)}t_{π(2)}...t_{π(m)}$ (we call this ordering of the multiset, $π(t)$, a permutation of $t$). We first show that in its most general setting the \textit{RCSstr} problem is {\em NP-complete} and hard to approximate within a factor of $n^{1-ε}$, for any $ε> 0$, unless P = NP. Afterwards, we present two separate reductions to show that the \textit{RCSstr} problem remains NP-Hard even in the case where the elements of $t$ are drawn from a binary alphabet or for the case where all input strings are of length two. We then present some approximation results for several variants of the \textit{RCSstr} problem. In the second part of this paper, we turn to the \textit{RCSseq} problem, where we present some hardness results, tight lower bounds and approximation algorithms.