Paper detail

Response to "Verifying quantum superpositions at metre scales"

The preceding BCA (Stamper-Kurn et. al., arXiv:1607.01454) asserts that our observation of interference contrast in a half-metre-scale atom interferometer (Kovachy et. al., Nature 528, 530-3 (2015)) does not prove the existence of macroscopic quantum superpositions and hence does not test quantum mechanics at long length scales. Moreover, the BCA implies that intrinsic atomic interactions or technical imperfections could prevent the application of our work to future differential measurements. On the contrary, we argue the following: i) in standard quantum mechanics, there is no known mechanism in our system that prohibits its use in future differential measurement applications; ii) our experiment tests quantum mechanics in that it constrains any modifications that would reduce contrast in an interferometer with arms that propagate over widely separated trajectories; and iii) using a standard definition of superposition, our observation of interference results from quantum superposition at the half-metre scale. In particular, quantum superposition is a more general concept than first-order coherence.

preprint2016arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.