Paper detail

Resonance phenomenon for the Galerkin-truncated Burgers and Euler equations

It is shown that the solutions of inviscid hydrodynamical equations with suppression of all spatial Fourier modes having wavenumbers in excess of a threshold $K_G$ exhibit unexpected features. The study is carried out for both the one-dimensional Burgers equation and the two-dimensional incompressible Euler equation. For large $K_G$ and smooth initial conditions, the first symptom of truncation, a localized short-wavelength oscillation which we call a "tyger", is caused by a resonant interaction between fluid particle motion and truncation waves generated by small-scale features (shocks, layers with strong vorticity gradients, etc). Tygers appear when complex-space singularities come within one Galerkin wavelength $\lambdag = 2π/K_G$ from the real domain and arise far away from preexisting small-scale structures at locations whose velocities match that of such structures. Tygers are weak and strongly localized at first - in the Burgers case at the time of appearance of the first shock their amplitudes and widths are proportional to $K_G^{-2/3}$ and $K_G ^{-1/3}$ respectively - but grow and eventually invade the whole flow. They are thus the first manifestations of the thermalization predicted by T.D. Lee in 1952. The sudden dissipative anomaly - the presence of a finite dissipation in the limit of vanishing viscosity after a finite time $t_\star$ -, which is well known for the Burgers equation and sometimes conjectured for the 3D Euler equation, has as counterpart, in the truncated case, the ability of tygers to store a finite amount of energy in the limit $K_G\to\infty$. This leads to Reynolds stresses acting on scales larger than the Galerkin wavelength and prevents the flow from converging to the inviscid-limit solution. There are indications that it may eventually be possible to purge the tygers and thereby to recover the correct inviscid-limit behavior.

preprint2011arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access4 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.