Paper detail

Resolving competition of charge-density wave and superconducting phases using the MPS+MF algorithm

Materials with strong electronic correlations may exhibit a superconducting (SC) phase when tuning some parameters, but they almost always also have multiple other phases, typically insulating ones, that are in close competition with SC. It is highly challenging to resolve this competition with quantitative numerics for the group of quasi-two-dimensional materials such as the cuprates. This is the case even for the simplified minimal models of these materials, the doped 2D Hubbard model with repulsive interactions, where clusters of sufficient size to determine the phase in the thermodynamic limit can be hard-to-impossible to treat in practice. The present work shows how quasi-one-dimensional systems, 2D and 3D arrays of weakly coupled 1D correlated electrons, are much more amenable to resolve the competition between SC and insulating orders on an equal footing using matrix-product states (MPS). Using the recently established MPS plus mean field (MPS+MF) approach for fermions, we demonstrate that large systems are readily reachable in these systems, and thus the thermodynamic regime by extrapolation. Focusing on basic model systems, 3D arrays of negative-U Hubbard chains with additional nearest-neighbor interaction V, we show that despite the MF component of the MPS+MF technique we can reproduce the expected coexistence of SC and charge-density wave at V=0 for density n=1. We then show how we can tune away from coexistence by both tuning V and doping the system. This work paves the way to deploy two-channel MPS+MF theory on some highly demanding high-$T_c$ SC systems, such as 3D arrays of repulsive-U doped Hubbard ladders, where we have recently characterized the properties of such arrays in single-channel MPS+MF calculations. The present approach could thus conclusively show that this SC order would actually be obtained, by explicitly comparing SC against its insulating competitors.

preprint2023arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.