Paper detail

Resolution of d'Alembert's paradox using slip boundary conditions: The effect of the friction parameter on the drag coefficient

d'Alembert's paradox is the contradictory observation that for incompressible and inviscid (potential) fluid flow, there is no drag force experienced by a body moving with constant velocity relative to the fluid. This paradox can be straightforwardly resolved by considering Navier's slip boundary condition. Potential flow around a cylinder then solves the Navier--Stokes equations using friction parameter $β=-2ν$. This negative friction parameter can be interpreted physically as the fluid being accelerated by the cylinder wall. This explains the lack of drag. In this paper, we introduce the Navier slip boundary condition and show that choosing the friction parameter positive resolves d'Alembert's paradox. We then further examine the effect of the friction parameter $β$ on the drag coefficient. In particular, we show that for large $β$ the drag coefficient corresponds well with experimental values. Moreover, we provide numerical evidence that the Newton continuation method (moving from small to large Reynold's numbers) requires fewer iterations to succeed. Thus the slip boundary condition is advantageous also from a computational perspective.

preprint2022arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access2 authors2 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.