BZPEERReading, trust and collaboration for research
Menu

Discover

GraphFollow connections around a paper, topic or saved view.

Workspaces

HomePick up where your research flow left off.InboxHandle requests, replies and notifications from one place.CollectionsCurate reading lists, evidence sets and shareable dossiers.ResearchSee your private provenance graph, trail and imports.CollaborationMove from discovery into focused discussion rooms.PublishDraft, preview and publish full-text research articles.

Network

ExpertsFind specialists worth following or asking for help.CommunitiesJoin research circles organized around shared work.PartnersSee external organizations active around the same topics.

Opportunities

ListingsBrowse roles, calls and collaborations with clearer fit signals.

Account

Log inReturn to your reading and collaboration workspace.Create accountStart saving work, following people and joining teams.
Log inCreate account

Researcher profile

Ingeborg G. Gjerde

Ingeborg G. Gjerde contributes to research discovery and scholarly infrastructure.

ResearcherAffiliation not importedOpen to collaborate
math.APphysics.flu-dynmath.NANumerical Analysis

Trust snapshot

Quick read

Trust 17 - UnverifiedVerification L1Unclaimed author
4works
0followers
4topics
4close collaborators

Actions

Decide how to stay connected

Follow researcher0

Identity and collaboration

How to connect with this researcher

Claiming links this public author record to a researcher profile and unlocks direct collaboration workflows.

Log in to claim

Direct collaboration

Open a focused conversation when the fit is right

Claim this author entity first to unlock direct invitations.

Research graph

See the researcher in context

Open full explorer

Inspect adjacent work, topics, institutions and collaborators without jumping out to a separate graph page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Published work

4 published item(s)

preprint2023arXiv

Directional flow in perivascular networks: Mixed finite elements for reduced-dimensional models on graphs

The flow of cerebrospinal fluid through the perivascular spaces of the brain is believed to play a crucial role in eliminating toxic waste proteins. While the driving forces of this flow have been enigmatic, experiments have shown that arterial wall motion is central. In this work, we present a network model for simulating pulsatile fluid flow in perivascular networks. We establish the well-posedness of this model in the primal and dual mixed variational settings, and show how it can be discretized using mixed finite elements. Further, we utilize this model to investigate fundamental questions concerning the physical mechanisms governing perivascular fluid flow. Notably, our findings reveal that arterial pulsations can induce directional flow in branching perivascular networks.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

New Insights on the Stokes Paradox for Flow in Unbounded Domains

Stokes flow equations, used to model creeping flow, are a commonly used simplification of the Navier--Stokes equations. The simplification is valid for flows where the inertial forces are negligible compared to the viscous forces. In infinite domains, this simplification leads to a fundamental paradox. In this work we review the Stokes paradox and present new insights related to recent research. We approach the paradox from three different points of view: modern functional analysis, numerical simulations, and classical analytic techniques. The first approach yields a novel, rigorous derivation of the paradox. We also show that relaxing the Stokes no-slip condition (by introducing a Navier's friction condition) in one case resolves the Stokes paradox but gives rise to d'Alembert's paradox. The Stokes paradox has previously been resolved by Oseen, who showed that it is caused by a limited validity of Stokes' approximation. We show that the paradox still holds for the Reynolds--Orr equations describing kinetic energy flow instability, meaning that flow instability steadily increases with domain size. We refer to this as an instability paradox.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2022arXiv

Resolution of d'Alembert's paradox using slip boundary conditions: The effect of the friction parameter on the drag coefficient

d'Alembert's paradox is the contradictory observation that for incompressible and inviscid (potential) fluid flow, there is no drag force experienced by a body moving with constant velocity relative to the fluid. This paradox can be straightforwardly resolved by considering Navier's slip boundary condition. Potential flow around a cylinder then solves the Navier--Stokes equations using friction parameter $β=-2ν$. This negative friction parameter can be interpreted physically as the fluid being accelerated by the cylinder wall. This explains the lack of drag. In this paper, we introduce the Navier slip boundary condition and show that choosing the friction parameter positive resolves d'Alembert's paradox. We then further examine the effect of the friction parameter $β$ on the drag coefficient. In particular, we show that for large $β$ the drag coefficient corresponds well with experimental values. Moreover, we provide numerical evidence that the Newton continuation method (moving from small to large Reynold's numbers) requires fewer iterations to succeed. Thus the slip boundary condition is advantageous also from a computational perspective.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access
preprint2020arXiv

Coupled Flow and Mechanics in a 3D Porous Media with Line Sources

In this paper, we consider the numerical approximation of the quasi-static, linear Biot model in a 3D domain $Ω$ when the right-hand side of the mass balance equation is concentrated on a 1D line source $δ_Λ$. This model is of interest in the context of medicine, where it can be used to model flow and deformation through vascularized tissue. The model itself is challenging to approximate as the line source induces the pressure and flux solution to be singular. To overcome this, we here combine two methods: (i) a fixed-stress splitting scheme to decouple the flow and mechanics equations and (ii) a singularity removal method for the pressure and flux variables. The singularity removal is based on a splitting of the solution into a lower regularity term capturing the solution singularities, and a higher regularity term denoted the remainder. With this in hand, the flow equations can now be reformulated so that they are posed with respect to the remainder terms. The reformulated system is then approximated using the fixed-stress splitting scheme. Finally, we conclude by showing the results for a test case relevant for flow through vascularized tissue. This numerical method is found to converge optimally.

0 citations0 reviewsNo code linkedOpen access