Paper detail

Resolution and Scale Independent Function Matching Using a String Energy Penalized Spline Prior

The extension of the classical Bayesian penalized spline method to inference on vector-valued functions is considered, with an emphasis on characterizing the suitability of the method for general application.We show that the standard quadratic penalty is exactly analogous to the energy of a stretched string, with the penalty parameter corresponding to its tension. This physical analogy motivates a discussion of resolution independence, which we define as the convergence of a computational function estimate to arbitrary accuracy with increasing resolution.The multidimensional context makes direct application of standard procedures for choosing the penalty parameter difficult, and a new method is proposed and compared to the established generalized cross-validation (GCV) and Akaike information criterion (AIC) functions.Our Bayesian method for choosing this parameter is derived by introducing a scal e independence criterion to ensure that simultaneously scaling the function samples and their variances does not significantly change the posterior parameter distribution. Due to the possibility of an exact polynomial fit, numerical issues prevent the use of this prior, and a solution is presented based on adding a st ring zero-point energy. This makes more complicated approaches recently propose d in the literature unnecessary, and eliminates the requirement for sensitivity analysis when the function deviates from the above mentioned polynomial. An important class of problems which can be analyzed by this method are stochastic numerical integrators, which are considered as an example problem. This work represents the first extension of penalized spline methods to inference on multidimensional numerical integrators reported in the literature. Several numerical calculations illustrate the above points and address practical application issues.

preprint2010arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.