Paper detail

Resistance of High-Temperature Cuprate Superconductors

Cuprate superconductors have many different atoms per unit cell. A large fraction of cells (5-25%) must be modified ("doped") before the material superconducts. Thus it is not surprising that there is little consensus on the superconducting mechanism, despite almost 200,000 papers. Most astonishing is that for the simplest electrical property, the resistance, "despite sustained theoretical efforts over the past two decades, its origin and its relation to the superconducting mechanism remain a profound, unsolved mystery." Currently, model parameters used to fit normal state properties are experiment specific and vary arbitrarily from one doping to the other. Here, we provide a quantitative explanation for the temperature and doping dependence of the resistivity, Hall effect, and magnetoresistance in one self-consistent model by showing that cuprates are intrinsically inhomogeneous with a percolating metallic region and insulating regions. Using simple counting of dopant-induced plaquettes, we show that the superconducting pairing and resistivity are due to phonons.

preprint2013arXivOpen access

Signal facts

What is known right now

Open access1 author3 topics

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this map preview

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.