Paper detail

Resilient Consensus Against Mobile Malicious Agents

This paper addresses novel consensus problems in the presence of adversaries that can move within the network and induce faulty behaviors in the attacked agents. By adopting several mobile adversary models from the computer science literature, we develop protocols which can mitigate the influence of such malicious agents. The algorithms follow the class of mean subsequence reduced (MSR) algorithms, under which agents ignore the suspicious values received from neighbors during their state updates. Different from the static adversary models, even after the adversaries move away, the infected agents may remain faulty in their values, whose effects must be taken into account. We develop conditions on the network structures for both the complete and non-complete graph cases, under which the proposed algorithms are guaranteed to attain resilient consensus. Extensive simulations are carried out over random graphs to verify the effectiveness of our approach under uncertainties in the systems.

preprint2020arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.