Paper detail

Resilience from Diversity: Population-based approach to harden models against adversarial attacks

Traditional deep learning networks (DNN) exhibit intriguing vulnerabilities that allow an attacker to force them to fail at their task. Notorious attacks such as the Fast Gradient Sign Method (FGSM) and the more powerful Projected Gradient Descent (PGD) generate adversarial samples by adding a magnitude of perturbation $ε$ to the input's computed gradient, resulting in a deterioration of the effectiveness of the model's classification. This work introduces a model that is resilient to adversarial attacks. Our model leverages an established mechanism of defense which utilizes randomness and a population of DNNs. More precisely, our model consists of a population of $n$ diverse submodels, each one of them trained to individually obtain a high accuracy for the task at hand, while forced to maintain meaningful differences in their weights. Each time our model receives a classification query, it selects a submodel from its population at random to answer the query. To counter the attack transferability, diversity is introduced and maintained in the population of submodels. Thus introducing the concept of counter linking weights. A Counter-Linked Model (CLM) consists of a population of DNNs of the same architecture where a periodic random similarity examination is conducted during the simultaneous training to guarantee diversity while maintaining accuracy. Though the randomization technique proved to be resilient against adversarial attacks, we show that by retraining the DNNs ensemble or training them from the start with counter linking would enhance the robustness by around 20\% when tested on the MNIST dataset and at least 15\% when tested on the CIFAR-10 dataset. When CLM is coupled with adversarial training, this defense mechanism achieves state-of-the-art robustness.

preprint2022arXivOpen access
0citations
0reviews
0saves
Nocode
Nodataset
0institutions

Next steps

Decide what to do with this paper

Use like or dislike for the fast social read. The more specific scholarly feedback stays available below when needed.

Log in to curate

Reading frame

Keep the important context close to the paper

Keep the important signals around this paper in one place: votes, save state, collection context, reviews and the metadata you need before deciding what to do next.

Institutions

Add specific reaction

Move through the context

Research map

Open full explorer

Move through nearby people, institutions, topics and adjacent work without leaving the paper page.

Building this graph slice

BZPEER is loading the nearby papers, people, topics and institutions for this page.

Structured reviews

0 review(s)

ContributeLeave structured feedbackUse the review template when you have a concrete strength, concern or method question.Open review form

No structured reviews yet. High-signal critique starts here.

Work discussion

0 comment(s)

DiscussAdd a high-signal commentKeep quick notes, caveats and replication pointers separate from formal reviews.Open comment form

No discussion yet. The first strong comment sets the tone.